1997 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 565 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chevrolet Blazer | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Blazer | 260 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4296 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2660 mm |
