1997 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Blazer (349 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Blazer | Epica |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 349 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
