1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 132 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Hudson |
| Model | Camaro | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3160 mm |
