1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1952 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 340 kg more than 1952 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1952 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Campagnola |
Year Released | 1997 | 1952 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2260 mm |