1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 599 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (121 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Isuzu Bellett | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Camaro | Bellett |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1469 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 121 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2360 mm |