1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 366 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK X. (360 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK X.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Camaro | MK X |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 3780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2900 mm |