1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 NSU 1000
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 844 kg more than 1966 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU 1000. (80 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 NSU 1000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | Camaro | 1000 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1084 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 80 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 66.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2260 mm |