1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1967 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 546 kg more than 1967 Volkswagen 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volkswagen 1600. (110 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volkswagen 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1967 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Camaro | 1600 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 110 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 7.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 978 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2520 mm |