1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1969 Renault 12
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 12 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 614 kg more than 1969 Renault 12.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Renault 12, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Renault 12. (96 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1969 Renault 12 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | 12 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 96 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 149 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2440 mm |