1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 221 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Camaro | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1997 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2850 mm |