1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1984 Renault Siete
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault Siete would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 709 kg more than 1984 Renault Siete.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault Siete. (85 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1984 Renault Siete | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Siete |
Year Released | 1997 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 72 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |