1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1985 Fiat Vivace
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 714 kg more than 1985 Fiat Vivace.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1985 Fiat Vivace | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Camaro | Vivace |
Year Released | 1997 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1370 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 55.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2230 mm |