1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Rover 825 weights approximately 63 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Rover 825, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Rover 825. (268 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Rover 825.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1986 Rover 825 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Camaro | 825 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3391 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 268 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |