1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1988 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 238 kg more than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1988 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Camaro | Sundance |
Year Released | 1997 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3391 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2470 mm |