1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1989 Lotus Carlton
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. (468 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1989 Lotus Carlton | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Camaro | Carlton |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 3615 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 289 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2750 mm |
