1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1992 Mazda 121
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 704 kg more than 1992 Mazda 121.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 121. (105 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1992 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 121 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 105 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2460 mm |