1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190. (153 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1992 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Camaro | 190 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 153 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 72.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2670 mm |