1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 314 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 626 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |