1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2000 Mazda Tribute is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 99 kg more than 2000 Mazda Tribute.

Because 2000 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda Tribute. (181 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chevrolet Camaro 2000 Mazda Tribute
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro Tribute
Year Released 1997 2000
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5665 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 129 HP
Torque 468 Nm 181 Nm
Engine Bore Size 99.1 mm 84.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91.4 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1524 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4400 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2610 mm