1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2002 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 101 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2002 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |