1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Daihatsu YRV
To start off, 2003 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 634 kg more than 2003 Daihatsu YRV.
Because 2003 Daihatsu YRV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daihatsu YRV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daihatsu YRV. (120 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daihatsu YRV.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Daihatsu YRV | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daihatsu |
Model | Camaro | YRV |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 120 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 79.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2360 mm |