1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Holden UTE
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 24 kg more than 2003 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden UTE. (305 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | UTE |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2950 mm |