1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Mazda 3

To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 104 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3.

Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (140 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chevrolet Camaro 2003 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro 3
Year Released 1997 2003
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5665 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 108 HP
Torque 468 Nm 140 Nm
Engine Bore Size 99.1 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91.4 mm 78.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1524 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2650 mm