1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (270 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 82 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (420 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Camaro | Condor |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |