1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 266 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
| Model | Camaro | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2710 mm |
