1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2005 Mazda B2500 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 181 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2005 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B2500. (323 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | B2500 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 4030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 323 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2990 mm |