1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Suzuki X2
To start off, 2005 Suzuki X2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 2005 Suzuki X2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki X2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Suzuki X2 has automatic transmission and 1997 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Suzuki X2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Suzuki X2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | X2 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2650 mm |