1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Volvo S40

To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S40. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S40.

Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo S40. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo S40.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chevrolet Camaro 2006 Volvo S40
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Camaro S40
Year Released 1997 2006
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1798 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2650 mm