1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 164 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (135 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Camaro | Condor |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1812 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |