1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Renault Megane

To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Megane. (300 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chevrolet Camaro 2009 Renault Megane
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Camaro Megane
Year Released 1997 2009
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5665 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 221 HP
Torque 468 Nm 300 Nm
Engine Bore Size 99.1 mm 82.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91.4 mm 93 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 9.0:1
Top Speed 250 km/hour 236 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2630 mm