1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Honda Civic

To start off, 2013 Honda Civic is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 230 kg more than 2013 Honda Civic.

Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Civic. (172 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Civic.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Chevrolet Camaro 2013 Honda Civic
Make Chevrolet Honda
Model Camaro Civic
Year Released 1997 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5665 cc 1497 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 108 HP
Torque 468 Nm 172 Nm
Engine Bore Size 99.1 mm 73 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91.4 mm 89 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1524 kg 1294 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4458 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1752 mm
Vehicle Height 1890 mm 1397 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2620 mm