1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 184 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Camaro | Countryman |
Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 155 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2595 mm |