1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 394 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC60. (441 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | XC60 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2774 mm |