1997 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1997 Chevrolet Malibu. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1997 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chevrolet Malibu. (210 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Malibu | Epica |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |