1997 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 136 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chevrolet Tracker | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
| Model | Tracker | A6G |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |
