1997 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 326 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | 616 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2480 mm |