1997 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Tracker | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Tracker | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1870 mm |