1997 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Tracker | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2685 mm |
