1997 Chrysler CCV vs. 1976 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1997 Chrysler CCV is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 4,700 cc, 1997 Chrysler CCV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler CCV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler CCV has automatic transmission and 1976 Lotus Eclat has manual transmission. 1976 Lotus Eclat will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler CCV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler CCV | 1976 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | CCV | Eclat |
Year Released | 1997 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1973 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |