1997 Chrysler CCV vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1997 Chrysler CCV is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 4,700 cc, 1997 Chrysler CCV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler CCV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler CCV | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | CCV | Cressida |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2187 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 66 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
