1997 Chrysler CCV vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler CCV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler CCV would be higher. At 4,700 cc, 1997 Chrysler CCV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler CCV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler CCV | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | CCV | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3932 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |