1997 Chrysler CCV vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler CCV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler CCV would be higher. At 5,460 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler CCV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler CCV | 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CCV | CLK |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 5460 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 382 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |