1997 Chrysler CCV vs. 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler CCV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler CCV would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler CCV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler CCV | 2013 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chevrolet |
| Model | CCV | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 5328 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
