1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 15 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Concorde | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1997 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 6550 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 213 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2960 mm |