1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1968 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,536 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 640 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 1968 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Concorde | 1968 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Concorde | Continental |
Year Released | 1997 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 7536 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 209 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2980 mm |