1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 90 kg more than 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Concorde | 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Concorde | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1997 | 1978 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |