1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1981 Ford Monarch
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 110 kg more than 1981 Ford Monarch.
Because 1981 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Concorde | 1981 Ford Monarch | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Concorde | Monarch |
Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 4122 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2800 mm |