1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler Concorde | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Concorde | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1988 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1750 mm |
