1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler Concorde | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Concorde | HRT |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
