1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2012 BMW M5
To start off, 2012 BMW M5 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Chrysler Concorde | 2012 BMW M5 | |
| Make | Chrysler | BMW |
| Model | Concorde | M5 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 560 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1455 mm |
